Family is Everything

March 1st, 2010

My brother Tyler Jewell has just completed his second Olympics, and it was once again a family affair.  The trip brought together twenty four family members and friends, and despite the nasty conditions on race day, we all had a wonderful time, albeit a wet one.  So despite the fact the weather was not ideal, the company and people supporting my brother could not have been a better crew.  I was proud to be a part of it, and was proud that my brother has helped me realize some of the more important aspects of life.

For this reason, my brother and I decided to produce this promo leading up to the Olympics.  Our family started to try and embody the expression, “Family is Everything,” after the 2006 Olympics, and it has become our goal to spread this motto around and remind people that in times of trouble, family is everything.  Please visit the website, www.familyiseverything.com, to read more about our goals and actions to spread the love that family is everything.

Tyler Jewell- New Zealand

March 1st, 2010

After an injury in 2009, Tyler needed to get some time on snow before attempting to qualify for the 2010 Olympics.  He decided to take his dad as a coach and head to New Zealand to train with the German Snowboard team.  Here is a short promo about the trip:

La fille sur le pont (The girl on the Bridge)- 1999

March 1st, 2010

Directed by Patrice Leconte

Only the French can make a film that starts with a seven-minute monologue of the main character answering questions in front of an unknown audience or tribunal.  The shot is at first straight on and then reveals an audience listening in.

Adele (Vanessa Paradis) sits in a black and white mid-shot.  An off-screen female asks her questions and encourages her, “Go on Adele, tell us.”  The questions are phrased in a presumptuous manner and attempt to guide Adele to answer in such a way that she see herself a victim, or to show empathy towards her.  But this dialogue driven scene not only reveals back-story and narrative trajectory; it also reveals who our main character is, and why we should care for her; she does not see herself as a victim and she answers the questions not for any motive except to tell it the way it is to her.  Her outlook and life attitude is somewhat fatalistic and full of despair; however, the way in which she answers the questions leaves a glimmer of hope that signals the fact that the predetermination of life is just as fleeting as the tears of her past that have stained her face.

The questions hint towards the fact that Adele should be seen as a victim, as someone who has been taken advantage of and brought to her knees by the disadvantages and inequalities of society.  But Adele answers the question calmly, and matter-of-factly contradicts the guided questions.  For instance, when the questioner asks about why she dropped out of school to be with a boy, saying, “You wanted to be free?”  And our heroine would answer, “Actually no, I just wanted to sleep with him,” and she would then go on to explain one of her simple interpretations of what she had experienced.

This first scene, I enjoyed terribly.  As a viewer, you can tell that by extension and length, the director Patrice Leconte is really trying to show us something to give insight in to the flick.  It does more than set the stage; it sets a mood and tone, and expresses a theme that deals with luck, fate, and how these ephemeral notions weigh greatly on each and every individual.

After this initial scene of Adele explaining how her despair and bad luck brought her to attempt to huck herself off a bridge, the movie begins.  As she inches closer, a man’s voice off-screen says, “I think you are about to make a big mistake.”  The two have an off-kilter conversation that eventually leads to them (after a few major events) to discuss whether or not we have control over our destiny and what role luck plays in all of these metaphysical themes.

As it turns out, our male protagonist, Gabor (Daniel Auteuil) is a knife thrower and actually looks for lonely and desperate women who are about to kill themselves to recruit for his shows.  Thus, how he found Adele on the bridge.  But the film does not simply follow its laid out trajectory at this point, and like any good movie, it explores conflict and power struggles by changing the viewers mind about how they view the characters and who they are aligned with.  In other words, what our initial thoughts about who holds the power, who is more sturdy, etc, becomes inverted, not only once, but a few times.  In this sense, the character development’s intent is to show the complexity of life itself and evade the simplicity of how we view relationships, especially sexual ones.

In the case of our two main characters, sometimes a sexual relationship does not even involve the sexual aspect, but instead focuses on the power struggles and desire involved with becoming close and trusting someone.  The Leconte is able to convey this symbolically through the metaphor of knife throwing.

The desire and tension is doubly expressed in the knife-throwers attempt to complete his task at one point blind.  With Adele behind the sheet, not being able to see her creates a strong tension of desire and suspense, something that is immediately mirrored in the director’s form.  The close-ups of Gabor and the crowd shots, as well as Adele’s release of ecstasy and jouissance each time a knife is thrown, could not be more linked to an act of sexual pleasure.

Why I think Lecomte has done such a good job, not only for following in the footsteps of a long French tradition of exploring desire cinematically, but also for his attempt to make the most sexual moments in the film have the least amount of sex in them, a very noble gesture.  What I mean is, the knife throwing scenes tend to be more sexual than Adele’s sexual exploits, despite her naiveté to make these escapades be more genuine.

In this sense, the director has cleverly made a statement; sexual desire is everywhere, not just in the traditional sense of intimacy and intercourse.  He uses his art of choice—cinema, to explore how these moments become a typifying experience of life and relationships.

Expecting Owls

February 27th, 2010

The Hoff Meets Avatar

February 27th, 2010

Tyler Jewell- Mom psych song

February 23rd, 2010

www.tylerjewell.com

February 23rd, 2010

Thanks to a good friend and a good web designer, Paul Bruns, my brother’s website is now up on the interweb and ready for viewing.  Please go check it out and get yourself geared up for the big race on Saturday, because its gonna blow some socks off some old feet.

www.tylerjewell.com

The Last Picture Show (1971)

February 23rd, 2010

directed by Peter Bogdanovich

It’s amazing that in 1971, a film could be handled with such class and still deal with issues of sex in small-town America, all the while avoiding cliché and sensationalism.  For this reason, Bogdanovich is the man.  He started out early on in the Golden era of American Cinema in the 1970’s, and made a film that had feeling and intent to deal with themes in depth, that were only glazed over in mainstream cinema.

Spanning a longer time frame without signaling the passage of time, Bogdanivich moves the film right along from scene to scene, letting his themes come through as naturally as life itself.  Through this approach, the film is able to be critical of ritualistic practices, and deals admirable with sex as one of these day-to-day life occurrences, as opposed to over-dramatic, or melodramatic scenes.

Producing some of the most iconic images of early American pop-cinema history, Bogdanivich is able to craft these pictures without explosions and highly produced glam.  This is not to say that this film was not expensive for its time, or that movies back then were generally more dull anyway, but my point is that this film does what American cinema can not accomplish anymore; and that is make a movie on the picture itself.

Shot in black and white and using the Texas landscape as a way to comment on town life, the simplicity in full-shot framing gives the film a minimalist tone.  Not trying to hard to make the scenes tell the viewer about the problems, but attempting to show through gesture just how powerful the human rapport is, power struggles in sexual relationships is mostly the dominant theme.

Our main character, Sonny Crawford (Timothy Bottoms), is a local boy in Texas whom the audience is aligned with.  The film follows him through the narrative arc and growing pains of a young man in a small town.  Dealing with everything from death, to sex, to war, the film spans a couple years and does not hold the viewers hand to tell them whether or not a month, week, or a day has passed.  Spanning such a long period of time also allows Bogdanovich to cordially deal with the issues he sees as relevant and mostly marginalized in mainstream.

In this sense, Bogdanovich’s American classic still holds cultural relevance, and it is this timelessness that demarcates it as such, a real classic.

Fever Ray

February 21st, 2010

Some dark shit- but so dope.

Embedding disabled by request, but here is URL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HvjK29Gpn0

Also watch these…

The Hurt Locker (2008)

February 21st, 2010

directed by Kathryn Bigelow

One of four women directors to be nominated for an academy award, Kathryn Bigelow is up against sure-shot James Cameron. No light weight her self; Bigelow was married to James Cameron, which seemed to be a working relationship. Cameron wrote the script for Bigelow’s 1995 movie, Strange Days.

But to her own right, the deeply poetic and sincere attempt to portray the French novel, The Weight of Water, (starring Sean Penn, Catherine McCormack, and Elizabeth Hurley) successfully works as a period piece that also takes place in the present moment. Through this type of authorial direction, she is able to write with her camera, as a writer, a novel.

In the French cinema tradition, Alexander Astruc first wrote about la camera-stylo, or in English, the camera-pen. This notion was to draw the correlation between the respect authors/writers achieved, and correlate to film directors. In this sense, Bigelow has certainly shown her penmanship for craft.

The Hurt Locker, her portrayal of bomb diffusers in Iraq and Afghanistan, was finished in 2008. SSG William James (Jeremy Renner), our main character, carries the stress of his character well, and wins his audiences heart by his approach. At one point shedding his bomb suit to diffuse a trunk load of bombs because if he is going to die, he wants to die comfortable, shows the twisted-ness of diffusing bombs.

Although a bit glorifying, the film does a good job of showing how a normal life is sacrificed when a person takes on a job like this and is good at it. I think the fact that a woman directed this is what makes the film so surprising for the American film market. The homo-erotic overtones are definitely prevalent, but the reigning sentiment of nationalism and American pride is unmistakable.

Bigelow’s films generally run with themes of machismo but I am unsure if they are critical or perpetuating. Either way, she is getting films made, and is pretty darn good at it.